<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2015-04-27 09:59, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote :<br>
</div>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTC9mKW-fVGJNjw93bY92+0-y2Pg=4P3nCiYEXdkwfP2+w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">2015-04-26 10:02 GMT+02:00 André
Pirard <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:A.Pirard.Papou@gmail.com" target="_blank">A.Pirard.Papou@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">Are we speaking of
artists or of studios?<br>
Can't artists perform in various places, e.g. at home?<br>
After defining artist_studio, will we define
artist_house, artist_xyz exactly the same?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
<br>
-1<br>
</div>
<div>an artist studio might be at home (e.g. in a house,
i.e. where the artist lives), might be used by a
collective of artists or by several artists which work
together or indepently from each other, it is a facility,
not a person. This thread is about a studio used by
artists.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
My proposition can cover exactly that: a studio used by artists in
the same building as a house:<br>
building=house<br>
building:studio=yes<br>
studio:artist=yes<br>
and if you feel important to stress that several artists can use the
studio, something like:<br>
studio:artists=yes<br>
<br>
+1<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTC9mKW-fVGJNjw93bY92+0-y2Pg=4P3nCiYEXdkwfP2+w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">building=anykind
(e.g. studio)<br>
(equivalent to building:anykind=yes which is usable for
multiple, simultaneous building types)<br>
anykind:artist=hisart<br>
or, equivalently,<br>
anykind:artist=hisart=yes (... multiple arts)<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
<br>
-1<br>
</div>
<div>this would lead to stuff like <br>
</div>
<div>building=power_station<br>
</div>
<div>power_station:artist=*<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Then we must reject artist_studio because it can be tagged on a
river node.<br>
Or German because there exist meaningless German sentences.<br>
You simply don't use what makes no sense, do you?<br>
<br>
+1<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTC9mKW-fVGJNjw93bY92+0-y2Pg=4P3nCiYEXdkwfP2+w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>The building tag is about a building. A studio is
typically a part of a building, not a building itself. The
kind of building should not make a difference to how we
tag the artist inside it.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
With my proposition, you may choose to have the studio as part of
the home=house<br>
building=house<br>
house:studio=yes<br>
<br>
Or as part of the building next to a house:<br>
building=house<br>
building:studio=yes<br>
<br>
Who could ask for more?<br>
<br>
+1<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTC9mKW-fVGJNjw93bY92+0-y2Pg=4P3nCiYEXdkwfP2+w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> The artist is, let
us say, a property or characteristic of the building, or
rather of its particular type<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-1, the artist is not a characteristic of the building
and should not be merged with the building, we should
rather have distinct objects for the two.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
"rather a property of its particular type" means "a property of
studio" means that "artist" is defining what kind of studio we are
dealing with, hence a property of it.<br>
Defining "artist" and "studio" separately to be associated is
certainly not "merging" them.<br>
artist_studio is more like doing it.<br>
<br>
In logical structured tagging, there is only one object, which is
what is "on the ground".<br>
It is a "building" and "house" is an attribute telling what kind of
building that is.<br>
Similarly, "studio" is an attribute telling either the kind of
building or what the house is used for.<br>
It has been written many times that we don't make a map of people,
and hence "artists" are not "objects" but attributes of the
"studio", or of the street they are entertaining etc.<br>
<br>
+1<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTC9mKW-fVGJNjw93bY92+0-y2Pg=4P3nCiYEXdkwfP2+w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> and his website<br>
artist:website=<a moz-do-not-send="true">http://</a>...<br>
or, if he had split his arts:<br>
artist:drawing:website=<a moz-do-not-send="true">http://</a>...<br>
artist:painting:website=<a moz-do-not-send="true">http://</a>...<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
<br>
</div>
<div>why not <br>
</div>
<div>website=* on the artist studio object?<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Conclusion.<br>
<br>
I have defined two subkeys "artist" and "studio" which can be
described in two wiki pages (at most).<br>
By combining them together and with other keys using the logical
structured tagging syntax, much like a phrase is built, I have
solved not only your issue and mine but also other potential issues.<br>
<br>
+1<br>
<br>
You want to use keys like <i> </i><span xml:lang="de" lang="de"><i>Donaudampfschiffahrtselektrizitätenhauptbetriebswerkbauunterbeamtengesellschaft</i></span><br>
and write a wiki page for each issue they solve.<br>
<br>
Are you going to write wiki pages for artist_studio, artist_house,
artist_living_street, film_studio etc.?<br>
<br>
-1<br>
<br>
Your -1 -1 -1 recalls me that I am on a "not" list, disparaging
ideas without the tiniest effort to find what's good in them and
trying to possibly improve.<br>
I am attempting to solve your issue, mine and others. You are only
interested in yours.<br>
I personally will use the universal solution.<br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>