<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, Sans-Serif;font-size:14px"><div><span></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1430916182000_3224">Lets be quite clear.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1430916182000_3232"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1430916182000_3233">I am not talking about travellers, itinerant workers etc. That is a different issue. Such places (trailer parks, mobile home parks, travellers sites etc.) are a form of residential landuse.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1430916182000_3223"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1430916182000_3234">Jerry<br> </div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1430916182000_3202" style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, Sans-Serif; font-size: 14px;"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1430916182000_3201" style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, Sans-Serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1430916182000_3203" dir="ltr"> <hr size="1"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> David Bannon <dbannon@internode.on.net><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Jerry Clough - OSM <sk53_osm@yahoo.co.uk>; "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <tagging@openstreetmap.org> <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, 6 May 2015, 0:08<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [Tagging] Camps<br> </font> </div> <div class="y_msg_container" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1430916182000_3200"><br>On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:44 +0000, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:<br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> It seems to me that the obvious generalisation, which would cover<br clear="none">> camps organised for profit and by non-profits would be<br clear="none">> leisure=vacation_camp. <br clear="none"><br clear="none">I don't think 'vacation' or 'leisure' are good terms at all. A lot of<br clear="none">people use the camp grounds we are talking about who are not on<br clear="none">vacation, retirees, itinerant workers, travellers. These grounds are<br clear="none">'mostly' open throughout the year in my part of the world.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">tourism= means people are there because they want to be and I think that<br clear="none">excludes refugee and military camps. Scout camps a bit grey ....<br clear="none">Maybe the key is that people don't stay there indefinitely ?<br clear="none"><br clear="none">> ... very specific British connotations associated with <br clear="none">> holiday_camp. <br clear="none"><br clear="none">Yes, I would consider the british holiday camps would be better called<br clear="none">resorts (?). The permanent building being the clue. <div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br><br></div><div class="yqt3850562232" id="yqtfd25037"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> In general I would use any derivative of "resort" : it is a word which<br clear="none">> has far too many meanings. </div><br clear="none"><br clear="none">Did you mean to say "avoid the use of " there ?<br clear="none"><br clear="none">So, in summary, why are we discussing abandoning or supplementing<br clear="none">tourism=camp_site ?<br clear="none"><br clear="none">David<div class="yqt3850562232" id="yqtfd24451"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></body></html>