<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">There is confusion between monument and
memorial ... suggest follow the definitions under the OSM tag
historic .. where <br>
monument is large ... as in you can walk inside it, over it.<br>
memorial is small .. say a plaque <br>
<br>
I have re-tagged some of the 'monuments' to 'memorials' where I am
familiar with them. They became eveident due to my use of OAMand
that renders these tags. <br>
If other renders were to do the same then more mappers would be
aware of the problem and it would be corrected with local
knowledge. <br>
So rendering these without any correction will lead to corrections
taking place as required with the best knowledge - that of the
locals. <br>
<br>
<br>
--------------------- Off topic <br>
On 7/05/2015 11:18 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAC9LFPd8Nox3gDDQYzgZrtzhJ2P4mWLzFkGA0xGLPjbHhk+9tw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div>It would help if the agency certifying the monument were
identified per<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/heritage">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/heritage</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
That proposal has no listings for Australia (possibly <cite
class="_Rm">www.<b>nationaltrust</b>.org.au/ </cite><cite
class="_Rm"> </cite>?) and ignores British <cite class="_Rm">www.<b>nationaltrust</b>.org.uk/
? </cite><br>
I've no idea how the 'level' is decided .. while it gives some
examples, it does not look like it has any explanation of how to
determine this. <br>
It is a proposal ... and needs some work? Certainly more
explanation. At the moment I cannot use the heritage tag. <br>
</body>
</html>