<div dir="ltr"><div>"Is there any good reason to avoid changing existing surface=brick to<br>
surface=bricks?"<br><br></div>Yes. In English, brick can be an adjective as well as a noun. As an adjective, as it is here, it should have no "s".<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 12 May 2015 at 05:40, Mateusz Konieczny <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matkoniecz@gmail.com" target="_blank">matkoniecz@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Neither is documented at wiki but meaning seems clear and synonymous.<br>
<br>
surface=bricks is used 1997 times, surface=brick 541 times.<br>
<br>
surface=bricks is also consistent with plural form of popular<br>
countable surface values - surface=paving_stones and<br>
surface=concrete:plates<br>
<br>
Is there any good reason to avoid changing existing surface=brick to<br>
surface=bricks?<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>