<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:17 PM, André Pirard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:A.Pirard.Papou@gmail.com" target="_blank">A.Pirard.Papou@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
And you make me discover a very fundamental rule I didn't notice
after 36 readings: that the tokens can be literal strings. And I
wonder how software supposed to tell whether it's open can
understand strings.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Software can't.</div><div><br></div><div>The dirty little secret of OSM tagging is that a huge fraction of the tags have insufficient semantic clarity or consistency to be </div><div>processed or rendered.</div><div><br></div><div>If it's unclear on the wiki, and not simple enough that people get it right 80% of the time, it won't ever be machine processed.</div></div></div></div>