<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/05/2015 10:39 AM, Dave Swarthout
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAKWFYhVmYJZOe=dwdOjvja+PBFS79Sce_-Q5c-kRVW0wGMOeLA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Regardless of people's views on this, the reality
        is that one of the main reasons people get involved with OSM is
        because they want to see the things they tag show up on a map
        somewhere at some time.
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Tagging for the renderer isn't going to go away anytime
          soon because IMO almost everyone wants to see "their stuff" on
          a map.<br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Absolutely. <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAKWFYhVmYJZOe=dwdOjvja+PBFS79Sce_-Q5c-kRVW0wGMOeLA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:58 PM,
          pmailkeey . <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:pmailkeey@googlemail.com" target="_blank">pmailkeey@googlemail.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr"><br>
              <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                <div class="gmail_quote"><span class="">On 16 May 2015
                    at 00:40, Frederik Ramm <span dir="ltr"><<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:frederik@remote.org"
                        target="_blank">frederik@remote.org</a>></span>
                    wrote:<br>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
                      0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
                      <span><br>
                        On 05/16/2015 12:03 AM, pmailkeey . wrote:<br>
                      </span><br>
                      <span><br>
                        > Tagging for the renderer is natural.
                        Mappers, especially newbies will be<br>
                        > disappointed their pet new feature they've
                        just added to the db does not<br>
                        > appear on the map.<br>
                      </span><br>
                    </blockquote>
                  </span><span class="">
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                  </span>
                  <div>Not at all. I'm suggesting additional tags for
                    basic graphic properties - and for  <a
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://www.openstreetmap.org"
                      target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org</a>
                    to make use of these ADDITIONAL basic tags. All
                    other maps and rendering would be totally
                    unaffected.</div>
                  <span class="">
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
                      0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
                      What you are talking about is essentially "MS
                      Paint with multi-user<br>
                      capability". That's certainly an interesting
                      project in itself but not<br>
                      something that we should remotely consider in OSM.<br>
                      <br>
                    </blockquote>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                  </span>
                  <div>Why shouldn't a user who adds a new feature to
                    the db be allowed to 'suggest' how it appears on
                    'THE' map ? Once the feature is designed to be
                    'properly' rendered, the basic graphic tags can be
                    removed.</div>
                  <div>I'm suggesting that these additional basic tags
                    are used on a temporary basis but would not oppose
                    their permanent use if others agreed.</div>
                </div>
                <span class="">
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                </span><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    If you 'add a new feature to the db' then you should describe it on
    a wiki page .. on that page you can suggest the rendering .. some of
    the wiki pages have it ... <br>
    <br>
    e.g.
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwater_tap#Rendering">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwater_tap#Rendering</a><br>
    <br>
    This does not mean it will be rendered. Nor does it mean it will be
    rendered in the way suggested. In fact many people using  the tag
    man_made=water_tap use the additional key amenity=drinking_water ...
    and it is the drinking_water that gets rendered. <br>
    <br>
    So if you want something rendered straight away .. pick an existing
    tag that is already rendered. If you want to add a new tag .. then
    do so, document it on the wiki ... and hope that lots of people use
    it and lots of them get onto the db .. then finally the renders
    might recognise it and it appears on the map. That is the way it
    works now .. unless you start rendering your own maps. <br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>