<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/06/2015 6:45 PM, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTDnYGMeGm0gmF8GM8NSVijbNpVwoHwWt2LmJP4H_jKu4g@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2015-06-05 5:10 GMT+02:00 Warin <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" target="_blank">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><tt>Shop=photo changed
to remove frames and framing from it. <br>
Reason.. there is a documented shop=frame so if the
shop=photo does frames then it should be tagged
shop=photo; frame <br>
I have included that information on the wiki page <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dphoto"
target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dphoto</a><br>
</tt></blockquote>
<div><br>
<br>
</div>
<div>I have reverted this edit. Frames are part of the
definition of this shop type at least since 2011, you
cannot change definitions of tags without discussing and
retagging first, or you will create inconsistencies (the
map not matching the definition). Multivalues are
generally disputed and seen as problematic, read here for
more information:<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Semi-colon_value_separator">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Semi-colon_value_separator</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://blog.jochentopf.com/2013-09-23-semicolons-in-osm-tags.html">http://blog.jochentopf.com/2013-09-23-semicolons-in-osm-tags.html</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Value_separator">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Value_separator</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thanks... I'll look in to that. <br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTDnYGMeGm0gmF8GM8NSVijbNpVwoHwWt2LmJP4H_jKu4g@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><tt> <br>
shop=hobby No documentation present so added<br>
</tt>
<ul>
<li><tt>text to suggest a more detailed tag be used.</tt></li>
<li><tt>link to the wiki shop= hobby area. </tt></li>
</ul>
<tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhobby"
target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhobby</a><br>
I think the 'status' here should be 'depreciated' ? <br>
<br>
</tt></blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><tt> shop=model No
documentation so added text + photo to its wiki page <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmodel"
target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmodel</a><br>
added link on the shop= wiki page. <br>
</tt></blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">both are tags with very few usage.
Still, new definitions should not be introduced without
consulting with the people using the tags. Before a tag
definition page is set up, there should be a proposal page and
sufficient time to consult on the definition (RFC etc.).
Please remove these pages (e.g. relink to the proposal pages
that should be set up instead).<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
There was no documentation - just a page that said .. in use -
please add documentation. <br>
<br>
So I have... <br>
I would have used the 'hobby' value ... but it does not fit well
with the main shop page that has a grouping of 'Arts, hobbies'
hence the cautionary documentation I have added there.<br>
<br>
IIRC model is a new page .. limited use and I'd like to use that
(instead of the hobby value above). So I'm documenting what I'm
doing ... as an alternative of going through the approval process at
this stage. <br>
<br>
Consider these to be forthcoming drafts ... better than what was
there. <br>
If the past mappers find and disagree .. good. I'll try to contact
them latter .. and some of the other 'model' values too (model_train
model_railway etc) though there are fewer of them again. This way
they will have something to look at and consider. <br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>