<html>
<head>
<meta name="generator" content="Windows Mail 17.5.9600.20911">
<style data-externalstyle="true"><!--
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph {
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
}
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
}
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst,
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle,
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast {
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
line-height:115%;
}
--></style></head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div data-externalstyle="false" dir="ltr" style="font-family: 'Calibri', 'Segoe UI', 'Meiryo', 'Microsoft YaHei UI', 'Microsoft JhengHei UI', 'Malgun Gothic', 'sans-serif';font-size:12pt;">
<div style="color: rgb(55, 86, 35); font-size: 14pt;">Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned. Planning your wedding is not the same as proposing marriage! </div><div style="color: rgb(55, 86, 35); font-size: 14pt;"><br></div><div style="color: rgb(55, 86, 35); font-size: 14pt;">Personally I don't think we should routinely display proposed routes, because they may never come to reality, but planned routes are ones that have passed the usual planning discussions and are awaiting construction, which can sometimes be many months or years, but will happen, short of a political change of heart.</div><div style="color: rgb(55, 86, 35); font-size: 14pt;"><br></div><div style="color: rgb(55, 86, 35); font-size: 14pt;">Jonathan<br>http://bigfatfrog67.me</div><div style="color: rgb(55, 86, 35); font-size: 14pt;"><br></div><div style="padding-top: 5px; border-top-color: rgb(229, 229, 229); border-top-width: 1px; border-top-style: solid;"><div><font face=" 'Calibri', 'Segoe UI', 'Meiryo', 'Microsoft YaHei UI', 'Microsoft JhengHei UI', 'Malgun Gothic', 'sans-serif'" style='line-height: 15pt; letter-spacing: 0.02em; font-family: "Calibri", "Segoe UI", "Meiryo", "Microsoft YaHei UI", "Microsoft JhengHei UI", "Malgun Gothic", "sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;'><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:voschix@gmail.com" target="_parent">Volker Schmidt</a><br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, 14 July 2015 18:38<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_parent">Tag discussion, strategy and related tools</a></font></div></div><div><br></div><div dir=""><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div>This is a question of language.<br></div>The OSM life cycle discussion <a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix" target="_parent">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix</a><br></div>lists "planned" as duplicate of "proposed". I would agree with that.<br><br></div>As a map user I always like maps that look ahead and show planned roadways, not only those where you can already see the construction work going on. <br></div>This has the added value when you plan a trip, that you would be alerted to possible problems (in case the local mappers missed the transition from "planned" to "construction"). I would tend to suggest that we keep the Proposed and Under Construction objects visualised with different representation.<br><br></div>Volker<br></div>(Italy)<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 14 July 2015 at 19:23, Daniel Koć <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:daniel@koć.pl" target="_parent">daniel@koć.pl</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid;">Hi,<br>
<br>
We're about to abandon rendering highway=proposed in the osm-carto (default OSM map style), but we think it's still good to show those which are closer to be really constructed:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1654" target="_parent" rel="noreferrer">https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1654</a><br>
<br>
Is highway=planned a good choice to be rendered instead or some other tagging scheme would be better?<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
-- <br>
"The train is always on time / The trick is to be ready to put your bags down" [A. Cohen]<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_parent">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_parent" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>