<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">A route should be verifiable on the
      ground.<br>
      <br>
      Verifiable via publication (paper, website etc) should not be used
      as a reason to add to OSM. Where would you stop? Would you, for
      instance, allow someone who writes an internet blog 'Where I walk
      my dog' & displays a GPX of the route? As Frederick has
      pointed out, there are exceptions but doesn't validate these
      routes inclusion.<br>
      <br>
      Dave F.  <br>
      <br>
      On 20/09/2015 07:45, Pee Wee wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAPx7Go7qErQPz+VEbrffpEr1gam6TSqDPsK0aYNvTx-GuwrwpQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            On<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2015-September/007805.html">
              Talk-BE</a> this question was asked. Since this is a
            question that applies not only to  Belgium I thought it
            would be good to raise the question here. User Escada asked
            the same question on <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/45377/can-we-map-hiking-routes-found-in-books">OSM
              help</a> that there is not much response there.<br>
            <br>
          </div>
          <div>Also on the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=32678">Dutch
              forum </a>this question was asked. Much to my surprise
            there seem to be quite a few that think it is OK to have
            these non way marked routes in OSM. Main argument is that
            there are also other non visible elements in OSM (such as
            administrative boundaries, bus routes etc.).<br>
            <br>
          </div>
          <div>To keep discussion simple I suggest that we assume that
            the author of the booklet/website etc, in which a route is
            described allows us to enter this in OSM.  (no copyright
            issue)<br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          What do you think?<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div>Is is OK to have (walking) routes in OSM that have no
          visible marks on the ground and if so under what conditions?<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div>Cheers<br>
        </div>
        <div>Peewee32<br>
        </div>
        <br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  
<br /><br />
<hr style='border:none; color:#909090; background-color:#B0B0B0; height: 1px; width: 99%;' />
<table style='border-collapse:collapse;border:none;'>
        <tr>
                <td style='border:none;padding:0px 15px 0px 8px'>
                        <a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">
                                <img border=0 src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png" alt="Avast logo" />
                        </a>
                </td>
                <td>
                        <p style='color:#3d4d5a; font-family:"Calibri","Verdana","Arial","Helvetica"; font-size:12pt;'>
                                This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
                                <br><a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">www.avast.com</a>
                        </p>
                </td>
        </tr>
</table>
<br />
</body>
</html>