<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/09/2015 7:09 PM, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTAh1bZW-GCmAS7gu_YJfKpJQYqTPVH8ufnp4Vs0qKDD2Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2015-09-25 11:00 GMT+02:00 Warin <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" target="_blank">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div id=":15n" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">There
was far more detail on the Russian page than on the
English page,<br>
<br>
leading me to believe that the Russians are leading ..
at least on this tag.<br>
<br>
Personally I see no reason why English has to be the
primary page.</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
because English seems to be the language most of us can
understand. If tags get developed in a different language,
people will not be able to participate in the discussion and
if the details of tags are not available in English, many
people will not be aware of these details and will not be able
to use a tag according to its definition. This can be
nonetheless an option if a tag is only relevant in a certain
geographical region, but for globally significant tags it is
clearly not desirable.<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I understand that it is 'not desirable' but <br>
where a particular group is <br>
<br>
a) developing something and they are more fluent in something other
than English then<br>
<br>
<br>
b) a particular interest in the tag that has not been active
elsewhere then <br>
<br>
I have no objection to them going ahead in that language. In fact I
would think that would lead to a speedier development with possibly
more people. <br>
There is little trouble caused by an automatic translation these
days. <br>
</body>
</html>