<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Nov 4, 2015, at 8:51 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com" class="">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">I think it's not that different to a cutline for instance, which is one of the most used values in man_made</span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">You are right, since it is a place where the land is cleared, a cutline is a clearing in the woods. Similar to clearcut too. but both of those are based removal of existing natural items - the absence of the original - not the growth/presence of new plants.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Many of the “growth of new plants” tags are inside Landuse (forest, meadow, farmland, orchard - which are all the more similar to a flowerbed) </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I was thinking natural=flowers because so many of the values are heavily altered/managed by man (rivers, streams, scrub, etc), but are still considered natural. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Perhaps landuse=flowerbed or landcover=flowers is the best solution. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thoughts?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>