<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com" target="_blank">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><span class=""><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-11-10 13:31 GMT+01:00 moltonel 3x Combo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:moltonel@gmail.com" target="_blank">moltonel@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>>> I like amenity=bicycle_tool_stand,<br>
><br>
> +1, "repair_station" is ambigous / can easily be misunderstood. Even though<br>
> "amenity=self_serve_bicycle_tool_stand" looks like an overkill on first<br>
> sight, it is even more verbose and less likely to be misunderstood.<br>
<br>
</span>What ambiguity of repair_station would be cleared by tool_stand or<br>
tool_station ?</blockquote></div><br><br></span>it is the word "station" that could be interpreted as a shop / service station. "stand" does not bear this risk (for me). "tool_station" would be similarly ambiguous.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>"Bicycle repair station" appears to be the common English name for this kind of thing. Here's what I got from various Google queries:</div><div><br></div><div><b>Tool station</b> yields that this is literally the trademark of a specific chain of tool stores in the UK. Nope!</div><div><b>Tool stand</b> gives results similar to "bicycle repair station", but with metal/wood shop workbenches instead. This is not what we intend, either.</div><div><b>Bicycle tool stand</b> yields at-home/in-shop floor repair stands, close but no cigar.</div><div><b>Bicycle repair station</b> yields an image search sample of several popular designs of the object in question. This would suggest that we have a user education problem, not a phraseology problem.<br></div></div></div></div>