<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/01/2016 08:45, Gerd Petermann
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:HE1PR08MB07640F38370CC090624CBF8E9EF60@HE1PR08MB0764.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;
color:#000000; background-color:#FFFFFF;
font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
<p>I'd like to see that the existing highway=access_ramp <br>
</p>
<p>are changed to the well known<br>
</p>
<p>highway=footway</p>
<p>wheelchair=yes</p>
<p>in combination with</p>
<p>incline=x%</p>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
The explicit "wheelchair=yes" would definitely be needed with those
tags as they don't make it clear that it's suitable for negotiation
by a "large wheeled object" - a steep footpath with corners that
weren't negotiable by a wheelchair could still be tagged with an
incline like that.<br>
<br>
Have you tried contacting any of the consumers of the "access_ramp"
data? I'm assuming that none (or almost none) of them will read the
tagging list; the DE forum will find a few, but a small portion of
the number internationally.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Andy<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>