<div dir="ltr">Well, I (or anyone else) can not just force mappers to use or not to use certain tags. Only way to deal with it is to give them better way to tag things. That's what this proposal is about. <br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-04-14 10:06 GMT+03:00 Marc Gemis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marc.gemis@gmail.com" target="_blank">marc.gemis@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Шишкин Александр (Shishkin Ale<br>
<<a href="mailto:kedermail@gmail.com">kedermail@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I assume that tags related to education that have been approved and do not<br>
> have "education" key should remain (not sure what to do with unapproved<br>
> tags).<br>
<br>
</span>I cannot advise on that. Not everybody is giving the same weight to<br>
the approval process. A usage of 7681 for amenity=driving school is<br>
not something that can be neglected IMHO, even when it's not approved<br>
(given they were not all imported by 1 person).<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
m.<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>