<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2016-04-26 12:11, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D80BF96D-47FB-410B-86D1-40E2271A89E1@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div><br>
<br>
sent from a phone</div>
<div><br>
Il giorno 26 apr 2016, alle ore 11:51, Volker Schmidt <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:voschix@gmail.com"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:voschix@gmail.com">voschix@gmail.com</a></a>>
ha scritto:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="gmail_extra">My tagging would be <br>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:40px" class="gmail_extra">tourist_bus=no
(no private busses)<br>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:40px" class="gmail_extra">bus=no (no
public transport buses)<br>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:40px" class="gmail_extra">school_bus=yes<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
+1
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="gmail_extra">But "school_bus" is used only a few
times. The only thing I found is <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access_restrictions_1.5"
target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access_restrictions_1.5</a>,
which proposes "school" as access tag for this, but this is
not good either, as it may be interpreted as including
private cars that carry children to school</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>+1, "school" is too generic, there isn't even a relation to
access (could be used for school types etc.)</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
In my mind it should be<br>
access:bus:school=*<br>
because the namespace based structured approach would lead all
taggers to build tags the same way naturally, without asking any
such questions questions and replying +-1.<br>
But I quit the idea after reading remarks such that the second word
shouldn't be the determinant. Here, "bus" determines what kind of
access it is and "school" determines what kind of "bus" it is. Some
would have made it school:bus which is incoherent (preventing access
to the schools that are buses) (1).<br>
I had written a whole set of strict rules to propose and it's in the
trash.<br>
<br>
Cheers
<br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
(1) OSM is unfortunately a place where you read an article about
namespaces that does not specify the order of the names and tags
such as "source=survey" that do not define what a survey is (my best
notion of it is an e-mail questionnaire I reply to).<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>