<div dir="ltr">Make sense to me!<div>Bjoern<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 2 July 2016 at 16:15, Martin Koppenhoefer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com" target="_blank">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
sent from a phone<br>
<span class=""><br>
> Il giorno 02 lug 2016, alle ore 14:13, Andrew Errington <<a href="mailto:erringtona@gmail.com">erringtona@gmail.com</a>> ha scritto:<br>
><br>
> Consensus was that it should be 'up' based on the convention of architectural drawings.<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>While I was in favor of this convention, I recall there wasn't any actual consensus. Personally, for me this was the moment to begin adding incline=up to all stairs I mapped (this approach is also more failsafe, as the tag gets inverted by some editing software when someone inverts the way direction).<br>
<br>
<br>
cheers,<br>
Martin<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>