<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/27/2016 7:15 PM, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTD=gttKkkG1AyvHZPr4X78a61hpimCY39_RTBp1gfiJOw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2016-07-27 10:54 GMT+02:00 moltonel <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:moltonel@gmail.com" target="_blank">moltonel@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div id=":3u" class="a3s aXjCH m1562b961ed5e9689"> I wentÂ
with access=permit at the time: it seemed to fit very
well, without needing a big discussion thread :p<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
yes, it fits well if you know what the situation is, but
without documentation you don't know whether this is only
supposed to be used for places where permits are generally
granted, or if it is also used for places where you need very
good reasons to ever get a permission to set your feet there
(e.g. strict nature reserves where access is only granted to
scientists).<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
For me access=permit (or any other value) says nothing about the
difficulty, time line nor any other feature of obtaining access. <br>
Few access permissions are sex based - the Isle of Athos (Greece)
for instance - males only, and even they need permission. <br>
</body>
</html>