<div dir="ltr">It probably couldn't hurt, since we've definitely found a shortcoming in the wiki definition.<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Jack Burke <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:burkejf3@gmail.com" target="_blank">burkejf3@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Should I bring up through;slight_right (and similar tags combinations) on the tagging list? The last thing I want to do is go through 800+ miles of Interstate only to have someone go behind me and "fix" everything by removing "through" where it isn't signed.</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Paul Johnson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Here's another example of how none breaks: <a href="http://mapillary.com/map/im/IUibLmC-b_nkLkYjziO7pA" target="_blank">http://mapillary.com/map/im/I<wbr>UibLmC-b_nkLkYjziO7pA</a><div><br></div><div>If you're only going by signs and pavement markings without context, this would be none|none|none|none leading up to the intersection, instead of left|through|through|merge_to_<wbr>left</div><div><br></div></div><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Jack Burke <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:burkejf3@gmail.com" target="_blank">burkejf3@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Paul, your examples are pretty much exactly what I've been doing, with the exception that for the last one I was using:</div><div><br></div><div>turn:lanes=none|none|none;slig<wbr>ht_right</div><div><br></div><div>because of the aforementioned discussion of whether or not to use "through" without signage.</div><span><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>--jack</div></font></span></div><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Paul Johnson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span>On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Jack Burke <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:burkejf3@gmail.com" target="_blank">burkejf3@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">So I take it that at least you and I are in agreement that the wiki is deficient for branching exits like this one: <a href="http://mapillary.com/map/im/7igAGXSa6EsUYlTIujXchw" target="_blank">http://mapillary.com/map/im/7<wbr>igAGXSa6EsUYlTIujXchw</a></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Yes, that's correct. Moving a couple frames closer to <a href="http://mapillary.com/map/im/MsMAW3HKVNYxEVCtkRneBg" target="_blank">http://mapillary.com/map/im<wbr>/MsMAW3HKVNYxEVCtkRneBg</a>, here's how I would tag three segments based on what's visible there and no other context:</div><div><br></div><div>Ahead of camera after diverging ramp:</div><div><br></div><div>highway=motorway</div><div>oneway=yes</div><div>lanes=3</div><div>ref=I 75</div><div>hgv:lanes=no|yes|yes</div><div><br></div><div>The ramp from the physical gore (next to the exit sign) to the tip of the theoretical (painted) gore (with the node for the intersection being even with the theoretical gore):</div><div><br></div><div>highway=motorway_link</div><div>oneway=yes</div><div>placement=transition</div><div>lanes=1</div><div>destination=Sycamore;Ocilla</div><div>destination:ref=GA 32 (also, damn, had to check the minimap on that, I almost said MO 32 based on the shape).</div><div>junction:ref=78</div><div><br></div><div>Behind the camera:</div><div><br></div><div>highway=motorway</div><div>oneway=yes</div><div>lanes=3</div><div>ref=I 75</div><div>hgv:lanes=no|yes|yes</div><div>turn:lanes=through|through|thr<wbr>ough;slight_right </div><span><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div>Your Osmand "invention" example is a perfect case-study of what I'm working on. I'm trying to get exits on I 75 in Georgia and Florida tagged with destination and lane guidance so that Osmand can show proper guidance, and hopefully other OSM-based navigation apps will add that feature, too. As it stands, I use Osmand to test my tags.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>I've been testing this, as well. I'm fortunate enough to live in a city that has nearly every kind of interchange to play with (except for some of the newer CFI styles, but OKC and...for like, no reason, rural interchanges with basically no traffic on I 40 leading into the Ouachitas are getting those) and well enough aware of the tagging in play to have seen what works and what doesn't, now.</div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>