<div dir="ltr">Yes, an obvious one: a building_passage *goes through a building* :)<div><br></div><div>Semantically it is quite important to distinguish between a colonnade/arcade and a building passage (BTW, also arcades and colonnades have their own tag). covered=yes just implies that the building is over the highway, but it might even mean that a protruding balcony "covers" the way. </div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Simone</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-09-10 13:09 GMT+02:00 Dave F <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:davefoxfac63@btinternet.com" target="_blank">davefoxfac63@btinternet.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hmm... <br>
The building_passage tag (65 445) is a new one to me.<br>
<a href="http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage" target="_blank">http://taginfo.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/tags/tunnel=building_<wbr>passage</a><br>
<br>
Looking at the wiki it's very similar to covered=yes (254 624)<br>
<a href="http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/covered" target="_blank">http://taginfo.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/keys/covered</a><br>
<br>
I thought there was a discussion here where it was agreed to be a
tunnel it would need to be below natural ground (ie a mountain or
river bed). <br>
These 'building_passage' all appear to be at ground level.<br>
<br>
Is there a difference I'm not aware of?<br>
<br>
Dave F.<br>
<br>
<div>On 10/09/2016 11:42, LeTopographeFou
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<p>Hello,</p>
I've noticed several typo errors in tag values. I would like to
fix them when it is obvious. When they all came from one user,
it's easy to contact him and agree on a fix. When it's worldwide
and multi contributors it becomes difficult to identify the right
contributor for each tag and contact them one by one (unless there
is a tool to say "this value for this key of this/those object(s)
have been assigned by Xxx, Yyy..."). In all cases I want to
document the edit in the wiki. But do I have to ask for a
vote/discussion for automated typo edits? The wiki is unclear on
this point.<br>
<br>
So I've made a proposal here for a first edit: <a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23002_-_Typos_with_tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/<wbr>wiki/Automated_edits/<wbr>LeTopographeFou#.23002_-_<wbr>Typos_with_tunnel.3Dbuilding_<wbr>passage</a><br>
<br>
Thank you for your feedback<br>
<ul>
<li>vote is ok</li>
<li>don't worry, document and do when it's obvious</li>
<li>edit one by one/contact authors one by one<br>
</li>
<li>do nothing and let the time do his work<br>
</li>
<li>are you silly? automated edits are evil for typos!</li>
<li>... ?<br>
</li>
</ul>
<br>
Yours,<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<pre cols="72">--
LeTopographeFou</pre>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
Tagging mailing list
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</font></span></blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>