<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24-Oct-16 07:54 PM, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTBJD5_vPO_vL-AXbWGAhjowFufb50MhwtzZdRiXG-Mxeg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2016-10-23 11:48 GMT+02:00 Warin <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" target="_blank">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<pre>And reiterate your words " in case of a dedicated area" and
mine "For an area dedicated to the hunting of game then landuse=hunting" ..
I think that is fairly clear ... dedicated, primary use is hunting. </pre>
<pre>Most 'landuse' have more than one function, but the primary use is tagged. </pre>
<pre>If the primary use is forest then it could be tagged landuse=forest with a secondary tag of hunting=* as you have put forward.
If the primary use is hunting then landuse=hunting should be used. </pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">who is declaring the "primary use"? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
The mapper - as usual.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTBJD5_vPO_vL-AXbWGAhjowFufb50MhwtzZdRiXG-Mxeg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">How would you judge this? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Same as I would judge anything else - from the available evidence. <br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTBJD5_vPO_vL-AXbWGAhjowFufb50MhwtzZdRiXG-Mxeg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">landuse=forest is the only widely
accepted way to tag an area where trees grow (besides mapping
single trees, and besides the landcover=trees property which I
myself try to push and besides the natural=wood tag which is
disputed in meaning because of the unclear term "natural"),
i.e. if you decided that a forest was meant "primarily for
hunting", you couldn't map it as a forest...<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I would use the following combination;<br>
<br>
landuse=hunting<br>
landcover=trees<br>
natural=wood (I too don't 'like' this and for that reason I tend to
dual tag with the landcover=trees tag. However natural=wood is
'widely accepted', just not by some)<br>
<br>
If the area were primarily used for the production of tees and/or
their products with hunting as another use I would use the following
combination;<br>
<br>
landuse=forest<br>
hunting=yes (or permissive etc)<br>
<br>
-------------------<br>
To me landuse=forest is only for areas where trees are grown for the
production of products from those trees e.g. lumber, wood pulp,
oils, rubber, maple syrup <br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>