<html><head><meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" /></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">Puting aside the pleasure to debate over landuse and landcover, what about defining hunting = as a permission tag, and invent a new polygon type dedicated to define a hunting area boundary where no other polygon is suitable to add this tag to? <br>
Yves <br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 24 octobre 2016 13:29:21 GMT+02:00, Warin <61sundowner@gmail.com> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24-Oct-16 07:54 PM, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br />
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:CABPTjTBJD5_vPO_vL-AXbWGAhjowFufb50MhwtzZdRiXG-Mxeg@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br />
<div class="gmail_quote">2016-10-23 11:48 GMT+02:00 Warin <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" target="_blank">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br />
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<pre>And reiterate your words " in case of a dedicated area" and
mine "For an area dedicated to the hunting of game then landuse=hunting" ..
I think that is fairly clear ... dedicated, primary use is hunting. </pre>
<pre>Most 'landuse' have more than one function, but the primary use is tagged. </pre>
<pre>If the primary use is forest then it could be tagged landuse=forest with a secondary tag of hunting=* as you have put forward.
If the primary use is hunting then landuse=hunting should be used. </pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br />
<br />
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">who is declaring the "primary use"? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
The mapper - as usual.<br />
<blockquote cite="mid:CABPTjTBJD5_vPO_vL-AXbWGAhjowFufb50MhwtzZdRiXG-Mxeg@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">How would you judge this? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Same as I would judge anything else - from the available evidence. <br />
<blockquote cite="mid:CABPTjTBJD5_vPO_vL-AXbWGAhjowFufb50MhwtzZdRiXG-Mxeg@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">landuse=forest is the only widely
accepted way to tag an area where trees grow (besides mapping
single trees, and besides the landcover=trees property which I
myself try to push and besides the natural=wood tag which is
disputed in meaning because of the unclear term "natural"),
i.e. if you decided that a forest was meant "primarily for
hunting", you couldn't map it as a forest...<br />
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br />
I would use the following combination;<br />
<br />
landuse=hunting<br />
landcover=trees<br />
natural=wood (I too don't 'like' this and for that reason I tend to
dual tag with the landcover=trees tag. However natural=wood is
'widely accepted', just not by some)<br />
<br />
If the area were primarily used for the production of tees and/or
their products with hunting as another use I would use the following
combination;<br />
<br />
landuse=forest<br />
hunting=yes (or permissive etc)<br />
<br />
-------------------<br />
To me landuse=forest is only for areas where trees are grown for the
production of products from those trees e.g. lumber, wood pulp,
oils, rubber, maple syrup <br />
<br />
<br />
<p style="margin-top: 2.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; border-bottom: 1px solid #000"></p><pre class="k9mail"><hr /><br />Tagging mailing list<br />Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br /><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.</body></html>