<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12-Jan-17 07:55 PM, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTD_u21Yt7F96s4M5mw6hSK+Mqo2P1H4suMhrSGCmr=4Mg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2017-01-12 1:19 GMT+01:00 Dave
Swarthout <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:daveswarthout@gmail.com" target="_blank">daveswarthout@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I
honestly don't see the need for another top-level tag for
this purpose. </blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">+1, IMHO we can use landuse for all
kind of surface use, be it "land" or "water" or sulfuric acid,
or whatever. In case of stacked "surfaces" (e.g. oysters in
the water and something different above them on the surface),
this can be solved with "layer"s and maybe other indications
like "depth", "ele", "height", etc. (also in case of land, the
landuse is about all or the principal use above and below the
surface, ie. there's an implied thickness)<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Nice .. some mines are underground ... with possibly separate use on
the ground itself. <br>
As far as artificial oyster beds (the ones humans use to 'farm'
oysters) ... these as so close to the surface I'd not bother with a
layer, there is no other use above these as far as I am aware, at
least not in my part of the world. <br>
<br>
So .. anyone against redefining 'landuse' to include water? <br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>