<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
</head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">Is there any reason to use a source tag now that comments are required on commits/edits?<br>
<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On February 7, 2017 5:47:46 PM PST, Warin <61sundowner@gmail.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<p>
</p>
<div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed; font-size: 14px;" lang="x-unicode">Hi,
<br />
<br />
<br />
One mapper has taken on themselves to 'harmonise' some local
source tag values.
<br />
<br />
<br />
There are many more that could be done along the same lines .. the
major example would be Bing, bing, BING, bing yyyy and bing yyyy
mm (where yyyy is the numerical year and mm is the numerical
month).
<br />
<br />
These could all be harmonised to source=Bing (the a majority of
tags carry this) with source:date=yyyy mm as appropriate.
<br />
<br />
But I would see no point in it. I think people will continue to
use there present source tagging practices ... I use lower case
bing for example and see no real reason to change.
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Are there any who see advantages to this 'harmonisation' ?
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
</div>
</blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>