<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 27.03.2017 um 17:29 schrieb Martin
Koppenhoefer:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTD2LDD4aEnWn3o-NEwfOaAqeTMaUyuuNzF6XSLqVgsLfQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2017-03-27 16:34 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis
<span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:marc.gemis@gmail.com" target="_blank">marc.gemis@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div id=":75d" class="a3s aXjCH m15b1032280de9c10">In the
case you have added e.g. a stop sign on the way. A
second<br>
mapper comes in, splits the way on the stop sign,
reverts the<br>
direction of one of the spit parts. Now the node is at
the end of 2<br>
ways with different direction and one cannot know what
is<br>
forward/backward in that node. But any good editor can
give a<br>
warning/error for such a case.</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
yes, the editor can issue a warning, but what should be the
reaction then? Shall we discourage changing way directions
because of a stop sign node on this way? Usually there's a
good reason for people changing way directions, adding more
complexity to these changes with highway signs depending on
them is not necessary.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
It is just a warning, that this is one of the seldom situations
where you need a relation - just check, obey and ignore afterwards.<br>
Furthermore the editor can check for the relation too.<br>
<br>
Yes there is a possibillity for such a situation, but I doubt they
would be essentially - and it can be solved by a relation.<br>
But a pure possibility should not effect the majority of simple
situations - it is OSM-like to consider simple solutions and spare
relations for the difficult ones only.<br>
</body>
</html>