<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">
<pre>A different view?
Both do not distinguish between;</pre>
<pre>
the <u>structure</u> e.g. obelisk,statue, plaque </pre>
<pre>
what it <u>commemorates</u> e.g. person,event, war (event), organisation, animal/s</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>Makes it difficult to specify/distinguish between;
a statue that commemorates a person
a statue that commemorates a war
a plaque that commemorates a person
</pre>
<br>
<pre>The use of :type should depreciated in any key.
Replacements? memorial:structure=* and memorial:commemorates=* ?</pre>
<br>
<br>
On 02-Apr-17 02:31 PM, Dalibor Jelínek wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:046b01d2ab69$f26692d0$d733b870$@dalibor.cz"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello,
if you ask what we prefer then I vote for memorial=* keys.
Dalibor
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Koppenhoefer [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com">mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>]
Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 1:51 AM
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
Subject: [Tagging] fiddling with memorial and memorial:type
I have noticed some recent wiki-fiddling with tags under the memorial:type
key. A user has discouraged their use and redirected people to the memorial
key, where these values are used significantly less, e.g. plaque and obelisk.
I do agree we don't need 2 keys with the same values/categorization of
memorial subtypes, but I think this should follow a discussion and not be
decided unilaterally, especially if the more active tags are signed as
discouraged.
Cheers,
Martin
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>