<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Landcover=wood (or the presently OSM
      popular 'natural=wood')applies to trees of all types, ages,
      planting densities and heights. <br>
      So there are some sub tags that can be used under that land cover.
      <br>
      <br>
      Harvesting operations are a function of land use (forestry or
      farm) and could be a sub tag under these land uses. <br>
      <br>
      There are some who say that the source tag should not be used,
      they want to rely on the changeset comments, these do carry a
      date. <br>
      Personally I prefer using the source tag. <br>
      <br>
      On 10-Apr-17 04:32 PM, Vao Matua wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CABvwQay52OPr+6OXtzWSEFu=ME_-aOxDTsg0FSY8SiqUhsXY=Q@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Clifford,
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>You are correct, landuse is different from landcover.</div>
        <div>I assume you are tagging farmland as landuse, not
          landcover.</div>
        <div>The problem with landcover is that the currency and
          consistency of the source information is critical and is very
          difficult in OSM.</div>
        <div>The OSM tagging for landcover should have two additional <b>required</b>
          tags: "source=" and "source:date=" . </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Regards,</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Emmor</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:17 AM,
          Clifford Snow <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:clifford@snowandsnow.us" target="_blank">clifford@snowandsnow.us</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                <div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 8:50 PM,
                  Vao Matua <span dir="ltr"><<a
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:vaomatua@gmail.com" target="_blank">vaomatua@gmail.com</a>></span>
                  wrote:<br>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                    <div dir="ltr">This is an interesting discussion. 
                      As a tree farmer and professional forester I am
                      offended by the suggestion that a harvested area
                      is different landuse from areas that are in other
                      stages of forest growth.  
                      <div>I understand the need to avoid current
                        logging operations, but I would say that crowd
                        sourced mapping is not the place to get that
                        information. There are so many basic features
                        missing from OSM, spending effort to collect
                        vegetative landcover seems like a lower need,
                        especially considering the fact that in a
                        relatively short period of time the vegetative
                        signature will be different.</div>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                </div>
                <br>
                Palolo,</div>
              <div class="gmail_extra">Thank you for your input. If I
                understand you, landuse=forest is what the land is being
                used for while landcover is what's there. To get a
                Warin's point, if you want to know if the area was
                clearcut recently, we should be using landcover. </div>
              <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
              </div>
              <div class="gmail_extra">We do have a lot of features that
                need added to OSM. But I always encourage new mappers to
                map what they like. Currently I have been adding
                farmland to my county. It helps tell the counties story.
                Farmland is just part of the story, a big part of the
                county is also logging. Right now I'm reluctant to just
                start adding forested areas until I learn more. Any
                suggestions on how we should be mapping forested areas
                would be appreciated. </div>
              <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
              </div>
              <div class="gmail_extra">Best,</div>
              <div class="gmail_extra">Clifford<span class="HOEnZb"><font
                    color="#888888"><br>
                    <br clear="all">
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    -- <br>
                    <div class="m_1864220755412104258gmail_signature"
                      data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
                      <div dir="ltr">
                        <div>@osm_seattle<br>
                        </div>
                        <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="http://osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us"
                            target="_blank">osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us</a></div>
                        <div>OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch</div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </font></span></div>
            </div>
            <br>
            ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
            Tagging mailing list<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>