<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<div style="color: black;">
<div style="color: black;">
<p style="margin: 0 0 1em 0; color: black;">Just because a tract of land is
being used for forestry doesn't mean it won't have streams on it, and low
spots may have ponds.</p>
</div>
<div style="color: black;">
<p
style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; margin: 10pt 0;">On
April 10, 2017 2:36:20 PM Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+osm@gmail.com>
wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" class="gmail_quote"
style="margin: 0 0 0 0.75ex; border-left: 1px solid #808080; padding-left: 0.75ex;">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon,
Apr 10, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <span dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com"
target="_blank">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote
class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
landuse =forest. areas used to grow and log trees (actual current human use
of land), a pond would not be included but a clearcut area still dedicated
to growing trees would.<br></blockquote></div><br></div><div
class="gmail_extra">In beaver country, there's nothing inconsistent
about a pond in landuse=forest. It might grow trees perfectly well if it
gets a period of low beaver activity, and that may be the intention of the
land manager.</div><br></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a class="aqm-autolink aqm-autowrap"
href="mailto:Tagging%40openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a class="aqm-autolink aqm-autowrap"
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>