<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16-Apr-17 07:54 PM, Tom Pfeifer
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:2b834b32-88e5-d9bc-388d-e6a3d1591bff@computer.org"
type="cite">On 16.04.2017 07:11, Tom Hardy wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/44.95741/-93.36230">http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/44.95741/-93.36230</a>
should show
<br>
a building=school (with amenity=school and other tags including
an
<br>
incorrect addr:housenumber and addr:city). The standard layer
<br>
doesn't show it but every other layer does, and it appears
normal in
<br>
the ID editor.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Seems you refer to this object,
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341791043/history">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341791043/history</a>
<br>
<br>
When I first looked at the map, it was rendered correctly as
building and name; however refreshing the page made it disappear.
<br>
<br>
So it looks like a glitch in Carto or in the rendering database.
Do not immediately recommend tagging changes for such reason.
<br>
<br>
I have opened in ticket in Carto:
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2611">https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2611</a>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Clicking the the history button shows the
area affected by a flurry
<br>
of large scale edits including by woodpeck_repair, though I
can't
<br>
associate edits with specific objects on the main page.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
The object history has 4 versions, none if the edits is by by
woodpeck_repair.
<br>
<br>
On 16.04.2017 07:40, Warin wrote:
<br>
> I think tagging it both as a amenity=school and
building=school has confused things.
<br>
<br>
no that should be fine. If an amenity fills a building, the
amenity tag can be on the building outline.
<br>
<br>
> I would remove the amenity=school and place that on a node
with the name and address stuff.
<br>
<br>
That would be a mapping regression, since the school fills the
building.
<br>
In the specific case it looks like the campus should be mapped.
<br>
<br>
> The wiki
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool</a> says to
have
<br>
> a single node
<br>
> OR
<br>
> a way that encompasses the entire site - including buildings,
parking, playgrounds...
<br>
<br>
This is not what the wiki says. It says "Mark the boundary of the
school using an Area Area or place a Node Node in the middle of
the site" thus it does not exclude having the amenity on the
building.
<br>
</blockquote>
Direct and fuller quote from the wiki page I linked to above .. <br>
<h2> "<i><span class="mw-headline" id="How_to_map">How to map</span></i></h2>
<p><i>Mark the boundary of the school using an </i><i><a
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Elements#Area_.28closed_way.29"
title="Area"><img alt="Area"
src="cid:part1.957460A0.8B279F35@gmail.com"
srcset="/w/images/thumb/e/e6/Osm_element_area.svg/30px-Osm_element_area.svg.png
1.5x,
/w/images/thumb/e/e6/Osm_element_area.svg/40px-Osm_element_area.svg.png
2x" height="20" width="20"></a></i><i> </i><i><a
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area" title="Area">Area</a></i><i>
or place a </i><i><a
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Node" title="Node">Node</a></i><i>
</i><i><a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Elements#Node"
title="Node"><img alt="Node"
src="cid:part5.B9C2974C.DF57B5E7@gmail.com"
srcset="/w/images/thumb/7/76/Osm_element_node.svg/30px-Osm_element_node.svg.png
1.5x,
/w/images/thumb/7/76/Osm_element_node.svg/40px-Osm_element_node.svg.png
2x" height="20" width="20"></a></i><i> in the middle of the
site if you are in a hurry (or don't have access to information
about the boundary and it is not obvious from aerial imagery).
</i></p>
<i>This area should envelop the full grounds of the school including
all the buildings, sports facilities and grounds. </i><i>For
schools with multiple sites the <a
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon"
class="mw-redirect" title="Multipolygon">multipolygon</a>
relation can be used."<br>
<br>
</i>The playground to the west of the building looks to be part of
the school going by its name. <br>
And I would think the parking area to the east of the building is
also part of the school. <br>
<br>
However on the information available to me ... I could not reliably
map the extent of the school .. so I would map it as a node only. <br>
I think this is not regression but removes an assumption (from the
present tagging) that the school is limited to the building alone. <br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>