<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 1, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Mattias Dalkvist <<a href="mailto:osm-stuff@dalkvist.se" class="">osm-stuff@dalkvist.se</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><span style="font-size:12.8px" class="">Hi all, please comment. </span><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/meadow%3Dwooded_meadow" class="">meadow=wooded_meadow</a>: A vegetation complex consisting of small copses of trees and shrubs and patches of open meadows.<br class=""><br class=""></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">The pictures on the proposal page look like a man-made savannah[1]. There are some areas near me that would probably best be tagged as savannah but I don’t see a tagging system for that. I’d suggest landcover=savannah (I prefer the newer landcover tagging [2] over natural or landuse).</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savanna" class="">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savanna</a></div><div class="">[2] <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landcover" class="">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landcover</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>