<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Hi Martin,</p>
<p>I have no clue what you mean with "downloaded the other day all
objects",<br>
I just adjusted a couple of objects (~5) whose tagging was very
erratic.<br>
</p>
In a lot of wiki descriptions is mentioned to "just act" if
necessary.<br>
I've taken the most common parameters and combined them with the
most obvious (existing) key.<br>
That's not rocket science... ;-)<br>
If someone feels that this should be documented more specific he/her
is free to do so.<br>
<br>
I think we will discourage a bunch of potentially interested
contributors to add anything<br>
if some request a discussion / proposal ("doctorate") for every
slight adjustment/documentation update.<br>
There are some (older) opinions here, I think this should be
followed up:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposal_process#Cleanup_Request">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposal_process#Cleanup_Request</a><br>
One example :<br>
<font size="-1">Yeah. The mailing list is kind of daunting. It seems
to get a zillion messages a day, but if I want to cut to the chase
and discuss a new feature I feel it will be lost in the noise.
Meanwhile the wiki has perfectly adequate features around
watchlists and discussion pages that don't require me to parse all
that noise just to hear the one conversation that I am interested
in. Karora 10:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)</font><br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Thilo<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 02.05.2017 um 13:04 schrieb Martin
Koppenhoefer:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTDhXDuCfqgLY8Acatc0sfK-6mF6wbO-CyyYq+E_rfq8DA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2017-05-01 23:14 GMT+02:00 Thilo Haug
OSM <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:thaug@gmx.de" target="_blank">thaug@gmx.de</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">[...] changing without
reviewing cases individually</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">this one?<br>
<br>
It leaves a bit of a bad taste if you declare on the mailing
list 'I'm getting tired of this "discussion and proposal"
stuff' and then it gets discovered you downloaded and modified
the other day all objects of a certain kind to unify their
tagging with a previously undocumented and hardly used tag,
and then modify the wiki to document this style of tagging.
And then write an announcement here without telling anybody
that you modified these objects to fit your documentation.<br>
<br>
On the other hand, I don't think it is completely harmful what
you have done, because there are so few of these objects and
we would all benefit from uniform tagging. The main issue is
with the key you chose, of which the general definition is in
contradiction with the specific tag you added, but I am trying
to fix tis by extending the key definition with a proposal.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Cheers,<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Martin<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>