<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body>
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;" dir="ltr">
<p>Well, here's an example of how I dealt with US-19 Truck over here in Pittsburgh were it isn't signed on I-279 or I-376 except inside of the I-376 exit 69 mess on the south side of the Fort Pitt Tunnels.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/571349" class="OWAAutoLink" id="LPlnk797648" previewremoved="true">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/571349</a> (signed)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3078417" class="OWAAutoLink" id="LPlnk355168" previewremoved="true">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3078417</a> (unsigned portion combined with the signed portion)</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>It's not the best solution, but it's all that's possible right now and still keeps a relation for the entire route since there is 1 sign on I-279 that does tell people to follow both I-279 South & I-376 West for US-19 Truck [1] since PennDOT doesn't sign
it along those two routes.<br>
<br>
</p>
<p>[1] - StreetView (but I do have personal pics of it): <a href="https://goo.gl/maps/m4ZQb2M6Xr72" class="OWAAutoLink" id="LPlnk350621" previewremoved="true">
https://goo.gl/maps/m4ZQb2M6Xr72</a><br>
</p>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Albert Pundt <roadsguy99@gmail.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, May 27, 2017 4:10:58 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Tag discussion, strategy and related tools<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Tagging] Unsigned portions of signed routes</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">How are unsigned segments of signed routes supposed to be mapped relation-wise? For example, PA 235 in Perry County, PA has a short unsigned concurrency with PA 17 going down into Liverpool, where both routes end at US 11/15. However, 235 signage
stops where it first intersects PA 17. Obviously the segment of 17 should be given the "unsigned_ref=PA 235" tag, but what about the relation? Routing software that relies on relations would probably assume 235 is signed here, so what's the proper way to deal
with this? Create a separate relation for the unsigned portion? Just don't add the PA 235 relation to 17 at all?
<div><br>
</div>
<div>--Albert</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>