<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>Hi,<br><br></div>This proposal sounds good, and I've got questions or comments<br></div><br>fire_hydrant: namespace is too restrictive regarding fire_hydrant:water_source<br></div>Can't we just use water_source instead? Many other devices using water can take benefit from this.<br><br></div>What is the difference between in_service=no and disused=yes ?<br></div><br></div>:type subkeys aren't so great, and fire_hydrant:coupling:type can only be fire_hydrant:coupling (or fire_hydrant:coupling_type to get more verbosity as said above)<br></div><div>The same for fire_hydrant:type, can't we use fire_hydrant only to give the delivery mechanism ?<br></div><div>The water supply part goes into water_source=*.<br></div><div><br></div><div>fire_hydrant:position also exists and it's definitely not a concept specific to fire hydrants.<br>position=* or at least location=* can be used.<br><br></div><div><div><div><div>I would agree it's a lot about semantics, but that's important questions to prevent errors or ease adoption of proposed keys IMHO.<br><br><br></div><div>All the best<br></div></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><b>François Lacombe</b><br><br>fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com<br><a href="http://www.infos-reseaux.com" target="_blank">www.infos-reseaux.com</a><br><a href="http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux" target="_blank">@InfosReseaux</a></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-06-18 9:33 GMT+02:00 Robert Koch <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:robert.koch@loggia.at" target="_blank">robert.koch@loggia.at</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Okay, I got the difference between the pillar hydrants. What
about dry-hydrants where you need to pump water out of a
river/pond. There is not a shutoff in the center of the bonnet.</p>
<p>Formerly this [1] would have been:</p>
<p>
</p><blockquote type="cite">fire_hydrant:type=pond<br>
fire_hydrant:pressure=suction</blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>WIth the new proposal this would be then:</p>
<p>
</p><blockquote type="cite">fire_hydrant:type=pipe<br>
fire_hydrant:pressure=suction</blockquote>
Is this right? In German one would translate pipe as "Ansaugrohr".<br>
<p></p>
<p>[1]
<a class="m_7278683817042727771moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/62/Dry_hydrant.jpg/150px-Dry_hydrant.jpg" target="_blank">https://upload.wikimedia.org/<wbr>wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/62/<wbr>Dry_hydrant.jpg/150px-Dry_<wbr>hydrant.jpg</a>
taken from [2]<br>
[2]
<a class="m_7278683817042727771moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant#Types" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_<wbr>hydrant#Types</a><br>
</p><div><div class="h5">
<div class="m_7278683817042727771moz-cite-prefix">On 2017-06-17 21:51, Kevin Kenny wrote:<br>
</div>
</div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
<div dir="auto">
<div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jun 17, 2017 2:30 PM, "Robert
Koch" <<a href="mailto:robert.koch@loggia.at" target="_blank">robert.koch@loggia.at</a>>
wrote:
<blockquote class="m_7278683817042727771quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Moreover how useful is "pillar" if there is "dry_barrel"
and<br>
"wet_barrel"? How would non-fire-fighters or non-local
fire-fighters tag<br>
such pillar hydrants?<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">"Pillar" is "I don't know which." There are a
few hydrants near me that have a different appearance from our
usual dry barrel design and carry signs warning that they must
be pumped out after use. I tagged them "pillar" because I
honestly don't know what they are.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Around the US, virtually universally, wet
barrels have individual shutoff valves for each coupling while
dry barrels have a single shutoff in the center of the bonnet.
You have to get pretty far south for wet barrels to be
practicable, since they'd burst in a hard winter. </div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="m_7278683817042727771mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><span class=""><pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="m_7278683817042727771moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="m_7278683817042727771moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</span></blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>