<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26-Jun-17 02:02 AM, Colin Smale
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:b973562211b0a5ebea413f21bff5d8be@xs4all.nl">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<p>On 2017-06-25 16:51, Michael Tsang wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left:
#1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family:
monospace">Dear all,<br>
<br>
Is there a generally accepted way to tag minibus routes? What
I mean is that, <br>
the routes are not part of the standard bus route network,
operated with fixed <br>
routing, and use light vehicles (less than 20 passengers).<br>
<br>
I am tagging those routes currently with type=route
route=minibus, but <br>
somewhere else in the world the minibus routes are tagged with
type=route <br>
route=bus bus=minibus.<br>
<br>
Michael</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family:
monospace"> </div>
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family:
monospace">It sounds to me like it is still a bus route. It may
have a different "operator" and be part of a different "network"
and indeed use a different type of vehicle, but it is still a
subtype of bus so bus=minibus sounds appropriate...</div>
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family:
monospace"> </div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<tt>+1</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>There is no restriction on the size of 'bus'. So I too
would use route=bus and then if I wanted bus=* to define the type
of bus. <br>
Some routes use several types of bus e.g. bendy, double_decker </tt><br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>