<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
W dniu 08.08.2017 o 10:44, Janko Mihelić pisze:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAA=vpS8tH9je_s9NU3ZV9hx2YEGzwFDsTrz1Mh+UOqsGb1jyzw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">pon, 7. kol 2017. u 21:48 Daniel Koć <<a
href="mailto:daniel@ko%C4%87.pl" moz-do-not-send="true">daniel@koć.pl</a>>
napisao je:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">We could
also try to craft internal classification similar to mix
used<br>
with roads, for example:<br>
<br>
"big river - "medium river - "small river - <br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I agree with this, but we should also correlate these
tags with some objective attributes like CEMT if available.
Countries love their own features, so the biggest river in a
country will always get the "big river" tag, however small
it is. Luckily, big rivers are often international so that
should correct things a bit.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
There can be more data about the river and the user can combine them
if she wants something more precise than general class, which may be
relative. For roads it could be surface=* or lanes=*, but most of
the time rough, relative classification is good enough.<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
"Like a halo in reverse" [M. Gore]</pre>
</body>
</html>