<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi,<br>
<br>
Wouldn't it be appropriate for this kind of discussion to ask
routing/GPS programmers like OSMand and Graphhopper etc. what they
use for route optimization and what else they would like to use,
hence us to do.<br>
I always say that the biggest routing problem (some people openly
LOL at OSM routing) is that taggers and wiki writers don't realize
that it's a matter of following the very strict, same rules in OSM
as in the routers.<br>
I'm disappointed to see basic misunderstanding show in tags like
many unnecessary bicycle=yes <br>
or [OSM-talk-be] Missing oneway:bicycle=no 2017-02-14 17:33 where <tt
style="background:#EEF;white-space:nowrap" dir="ltr"><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway:bicycle"
title="Key:oneway:bicycle" class="mw-redirect">oneway:bicycle</a>=no</tt>,
an instruction to routers, is confused with <a href="Key:cycleway"><tt>Key:cycleway</tt></a>,
the indication of the presence of a cycleway.<br>
The explanation of <tt style="background:#EEF;white-space:nowrap"
dir="ltr"><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway"
title="Key:cycleway">cycleway</a>=opposite*</tt> and its
presence in the "access" page make believe that it's an access tag
when it's not (a cycle map confuses them and a friend tagged them
both everywhere where there is no cycleway).<br>
I'm also disappointed that I, instead of the LOL above, have been
called sarcastic for saying things like this and help.<br>
<br>
Cheers
<br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>