<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19-Sep-17 09:54 AM, Kevin Kenny
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALREZe_P7=5qQGM5hW_sCQZW_4HFKtV8EB=hM=A+XKuPfvungg@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:58 PM,
            Warin <span dir="ltr"><<a
                href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>></span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
              <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><span class="gmail-">
                  <div
                    class="gmail-m_-9136912722454805750moz-cite-prefix">On
                    19-Sep-17 03:56 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div class="gmail_extra">
                        <div class="gmail_quote">The real-life sign
                          says, "Access by permit only, for information
                          contact..." and that's what I propose to map!</div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                </span> Yep. <br>
                I think the important thing is the contact information -
                this is where the detail of what is required can be
                obtained rather than having those details in OSM. <br>
                It is the details that vary a lot from place to place
                and maybe too varied around the world for renders to be
                bothered with. It might just change from time to time,
                rather not have the dynamic stuff on OSM? <br>
                <br>
                So access=permit with permit_contact:web/email/<wbr>phone/*=*
                ??? <br>
                Would that be a compromise 'we' can all use? </div>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>You mean, likeĀ <a
                href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424226491"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424226491</a>
              (and all the other parcels from that <a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import:_NYCDEP_Watershed_Recreation_Areas"
                moz-do-not-send="true">import</a>)?</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>It's already there. At least on everything that I've
              ever tagged with *=permit. So there's zero additional work
              for me in complying with your request. :)</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    My comments are not a request, but a suggestion. Hence the question
    marks.<br>
    <br>
    I don't think the tagging onĀ  <a
      href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424226491">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424226491</a>
    goes far enough. <br>
    There is no specific contact information for a permit. <br>
    Not all permits come from the land owners/controllers some come from
    another body e.g. Kokoda Track. <br>
  </body>
</html>