<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2017-10-03 12:32 GMT+02:00 marc marc <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com" target="_blank">marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">and more, if you delete the banners that warn the problem, it is clearly<br>
an intention to mislead people and / or manipulate the result of the<br>
invalid vote of the proposal, which in my opinion alone justifies a<br>
radical clarification to make the difference between "a mapper creates a<br>
lot of tag for its use" and "a validated proposal which allows to<br>
"guarantee" a research of quality and opinion predominantly positive"<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>+1</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
take a look at its history of massive new tag creation while the<br>
majority are current proposals<br>
> <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?limit=500&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Rtfm&namespace=&tagfilter=&newOnly=1&year=2017&month=-1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/w/index.php?limit=500&<wbr>title=Special%3AContributions&<wbr>contribs=user&target=Rtfm&<wbr>namespace=&tagfilter=&newOnly=<wbr>1&year=2017&month=-1</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">this reveals indeed some problematic edits. E.g.  a new key page for surfing:shoes was created 2 weeks ago and still there isn't even a single instance of this tag in the db.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Cheers,</div><div class="gmail_extra">Martin<br></div></div>