<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div>Hi,<br><br></div>Same as Marc too.<br></div>This proposal was discussed for months prior to start voting.<br><br></div>Fortunatly, tags don't need to be "approved" to be used.<br></div>If tagging sounds good to people, they will use it, although updating tools ease a lot the adoption process (only with so called approved tagging).<br></div>A longer time will be required to make it better.<br><br><br></div>François<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><b>François Lacombe</b><br><br>fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com<br><a href="http://www.infos-reseaux.com" target="_blank">www.infos-reseaux.com</a><br><a href="http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux" target="_blank">@InfosReseaux</a></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-10-05 15:58 GMT+02:00 Mark Bradley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ethnicfoodisgreat@gmail.com" target="_blank">ethnicfoodisgreat@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">> Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:14:56 +0000<br>
> From: marc marc <<a href="mailto:marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com">marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com</a>><br>
> To: "<a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant<br>
> Extensions)<br>
<div><div class="h5">><br>
> Hello,<br>
><br>
> Le 05. 10. 17 à 12:16, Viking a écrit :<br>
> > I really don't understand why so many people oppose this proposal [1]<br>
> > without ever having participated in the discussions<br>
> it is indeed strange that no opponent took the time to say during the RFC arguments<br>
> that are found now during the vote.<br>
><br>
> yes the wiki page need a cleaning between the basic tags and the advanced tags. is it<br>
> the role of a tag vote to talk about the layout of the wiki page or should we talk<br>
> about tag changes ?<br>
> imho wiki layout doesn't need a vote, it only need to follow tag meaning<br>
><br>
> yes the proposal will change many objects but changing 1k objects or 100k it is the<br>
> same work when updating an app.<br>
><br>
> yes it will need a transition period for the few specialized apps to be updated but it is<br>
> not by splitting the proposal tag by tag that it will be better, on the contrary devs will<br>
> have to do x release instead of being able to group them.<br>
><br>
> There are also hardly understandable arguments as opposed to the replacement of<br>
> fire_hydrant:position by location since they have the same meaning.<br>
><br>
> ihmo removing the namespace when it is useless and the proposed additional (and<br>
> optional) tags are a heavy but coherent and positive set<br>
><br>
> Regardless of the outcome of the ongoing vote, I would like to take this opportunity<br>
> to thank you for the time you have devoted to it and for the constructive spirit in the<br>
> search for a concessus.<br>
><br>
> I hope that this energy will persist if the current proposal fails due to "voting-only"<br>
> people.<br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
> Marc<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div>I echo Marc's sentiment!<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Mark<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>