<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:graemefitz1@gmail.com" target="_blank">graemefitz1@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">How about this one then? :-)<div><br><div><br></div><div><a href="http://ccheadliner.com/news/world-s-smallest-cathedral-about-to-close/article_156ea8a8-dbaf-11df-9bd0-001cc4c03286.html" target="_blank">http://ccheadliner.com/news/<wbr>world-s-smallest-cathedral-<wbr>about-to-close/article_<wbr>156ea8a8-dbaf-11df-9bd0-<wbr>001cc4c03286.html</a><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>A Bishop lived on site & conducted services every day, so it <i>would</i> have been a cathedral (even though it looks like a garden shed!), so I guess it should be tagged that way?</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div style="font-family:georgia,serif" class="gmail_default">and our Wiki even has a <tt style="background:rgb(238,238,255) none repeat scroll 0% 0%;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6" dir="ltr" class="gmail-mw-content-ltr"><a class="gmail-mw-selflink gmail-selflink">denomination</a>=old_catholic</tt> which would be correct for these schismatics. <br></div><div style="font-family:georgia,serif" class="gmail_default">(Which Wiki entry should, but does not yet, link <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Catholic_Church">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Catholic_Church</a> . There are much larger OCC sects than the one with this "cathedral".)<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><br></div><div>As it's now closed & been de-consecrated, what should it now be tagged as in OSM - building_yes; historic_church, possibly with start & end dates, even though it's just in someone's backyard?</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div style="font-family:georgia,serif" class="gmail_default">building=yes <br></div><div style="font-family:georgia,serif" class="gmail_default">I agree. I wouldn't have called it  building=church even while it was consecrated by this minor splinter denomination (165 adherents), since as you say, it's a garden shed used as a chapel and cathedra, not a basilica with a cathedra​, with or without transept. (I would have inlcuded amenity for worship, but no longer.)<br></div><div style="font-family:georgia,serif" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:georgia,serif" class="gmail_default">historic_church -- for expansively small values of historic and church, but it does rise to Wikipedia's Notability level. <br></div><div style="font-family:georgia,serif" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:georgia,serif" class="gmail_default">The Building way or point should link either  <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Pruter">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Pruter</a>  <br></div><div style="font-family:georgia,serif" class="gmail_default">or <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ_Catholic_Church_(Pruter)">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ_Catholic_Church_(Pruter)</a> <br></div><div style="font-family:georgia,serif" class="gmail_default">or possibly both.<br></div><div style="font-family:georgia,serif" class="gmail_default"><br></div></div></div></div>