<div dir="ltr"><pre><span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-short_text" lang="en"><span class="gmail-">I understand that <span class="gmail-">ta</span>g </span></span>amenity=drinking_water <span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-" lang="en"><span class="gmail-">is a problem because it complicates basic tagging </span></span><span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-short_text" lang="en"><span class="gmail-">water sources<span class="gmail-">.<br></span></span></span><span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-short_text" lang="en"><span class="gmail-"><span class="gmail-"><span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-" lang="en"><span class="gmail-">I understand that the amenity=water_point is repair method has appeared</span></span>. </span></span></span><span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-" lang="en"><span class="gmail-">Why not try to fix basic tagging. <br></span></span><span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-" lang="en"><span class="gmail-">Current tagging goes into atomization, fragmentation.<br></span></span></pre><pre><span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-" lang="en"><span class="gmail-">Maybe in 10 years we will have 10 tags responsible for water (3 for drinking water 
and 7 for non-</span></span><span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-" lang="en"><span class="gmail-"><span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-" lang="en"><span class="gmail-">drinking water</span></span> plus subtags, etc.) ..... that makes sense?<br><br></span></span></pre><pre><span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-" lang="en"><span class="gmail-">Best Regards</span></span><span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-" lang="en"><span class="gmail-"><br>Slavo<br></span></span></pre><pre><span id="gmail-result_box" class="gmail-" lang="en"><span class="gmail-"></span></span></pre></div>