<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2018-01-16 9:34 GMT+01:00 Malcolm Herring <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:malcolm.herring@btinternet.com" target="_blank">malcolm.herring@btinternet.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="gmail-">On 16/01/2018 00:21, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
In what way would you consider that these are not lighthouse's? Just because they don't have accommodation?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
Point taken. I was referring to the historical structures rather than any modern replacements.<br>
<br>
The main point that I was trying to make is that a simple pile or lattice tower with a light on top should not be tagged as man_made=lighthouse, but man_made=beacon.</blockquote></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">probably with exceptions, e.g. this is a lighthouse from 1911 (i.e. historic) with a lattice structure, generally considered a lighthouse:</div><div class="gmail_extra"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adziogol_Lighthouse">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adziogol_Lighthouse</a></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Cheers,<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Martin<br></div></div>