<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/04/2018 14:52, Paul Allen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dOLMCfjd+cnuKJ=_SV1G4oBMdFWZt17wkVP=mRLEGSVfhw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><font size="2">Although other updates I made at the same
time were rendered, the pumping<br>
station wasn't. <br>
</font></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
... on some maps. It'll appear on others, such as:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=20&lat=52.0821841&lon=-4.657313">https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=20&lat=52.0821841&lon=-4.657313</a>
*<br>
<br>
I wouldn't let the fact that one map style has problems with certain
kinds of infrastructure influence tagging. Generally speaking
mappers are pretty good at figuring out when a building or a landuse
tag is needed in addition to an existing feature tag. Outright "
falsehoods to fool the renderer" are actually pretty rare. Of
course by all means try and improve the wiki page for a particular
feature explaining how people map things (buildings vs
non-buildings). This probably means I'm agreeing with "4" of your
list of 7, but TBH anything that improves the wik iand reflects
current tagging would be good.<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
Andy<br>
<br>
<br>
* the fact that it currently appears on that map in English rather
than Welsh is actually a bug, but that's a different issue...<br>
</body>
</html>