<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
19. May 2018 04:33 by <a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>:<br /><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">The intermittent tag continues to be confused with seasonal.<br /><br />Possibly this is because some want to use it to indicate that a follow is both seasonal and intermittent?<br /></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>At least in my case it was like this:</p><p><br /></p><p>- I discovered intermittent tag</p><p>- later I encountered someone claiming that seasonal water flow <br /></p><p> should be tagged with seasonal tag</p><p>- I checked intermittent definition in some sources and found no <br /></p><p> confirmation that "intermittent" excludes cyclic changes</p><div>- I continue to use intermittent for anything waterway-related</div><div> that has no constant presence of water but maybe I also started using</div><div> seasonal=yes for some clearly seasonal features<br /></div><div><br /></div><div>BTW, what in your opinion should be used for spring that is</div><div><br /></div><div>- active during snow melt</div><div>- active after heavy rains</div><div>- active continuously if within previous months/years weather was wet</div><div><br /></div><div>?</div><div><br /></div><div>Note also that successful redefining of popular tags is likely to fail.</div><div>Changing Wiki description is not magically changing what was tagged.<br /></div> </body>
</html>