<div dir="ltr">On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Mateusz Konieczny <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matkoniecz@tutanota.com" target="_blank">matkoniecz@tutanota.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div>
27. May 2018 15:20 by <a href="mailto:pla16021@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">pla16021@gmail.com</a>:</div></blockquote><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><p>Is there anything missing?</p></div></blockquote><div>Having had time to think about it, I don't think that removal, dismantling or even partial<br></div><div>dismantling are essential characteristics.<br><br></div><div>Take a look at <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.23546&mlon=-1.42869#map=19/53.23546/-1.42869">https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.23546&mlon=-1.42869#map=19/53.23546/-1.42869</a><br></div><div>and then look at it in some street-level imagery (even if it's the kind we're not permitted to take mapping<br></div><div>info from, since you're just looking at images, not mapping from them).  For those who like to be<br></div><div>spoon-fed, try <a href="https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.2357209,-1.428703,3a,75y,162.59h,87.6t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s-UNcyB5F4g0xgJvYytCFBg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D-UNcyB5F4g0xgJvYytCFBg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D80.62932%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656">https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.2357209,-1.428703,3a,75y,162.59h,87.6t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s-UNcyB5F4g0xgJvYytCFBg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D-UNcyB5F4g0xgJvYytCFBg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D80.62932%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656</a><br><br></div><div>There are several rows of market stall with footpaths (not streets) between them.  I don't think that<br></div><div>disqualifies them.  The frames are (as I recall) permanent fixtures.  I don't think that disqualifies them.<br></div><div>It looks like the canvas canopy may no longer be able to be rolled up to prevent damage from high<br></div><div>winds, but I can't be certain of that.  In any case, I don't think that disqualifies them.<br><br></div><div>The defining characteristic, to my mind, is that they are not enclosed by walls.  The trader must<br></div><div>remove the items overnight.  The trader may leave the stall briefly to go to the toilet, when nearby<br></div><div>traders will keep an eye on things, but if the goods were left there unattended overnight they'd<br></div><div>be spirited away.  Those are operational details, though.  The thing that makes them street<br></div><div>vendors is that they're on the street (those on the periphery are on pedestrianized streets, the<br>rest are on footpaths between stalls) and there are no walls or other barriers to prevent access at<br>any time.<br><br>You may think otherwise, but I'd call them street vendors.<br><br>-- <br></div><div>Paul<br><br></div></div></div></div>