<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br /><div>For building constructed to house such equipment</div><div>I would expect building=service, not building=yes<br /></div><br />9. Jun 2018 14:38 by <a href="mailto:fl.infosreseaux@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">fl.infosreseaux@gmail.com</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><div>Hi all,</div><div><br /></div><div>A new proposal is now available to describe telecom local networks, from
subscribers households
to first network premises.<br /></div><div>Have a look here : <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Telecom_local_loop" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Telecom_local_loop</a></div><div>It introduces a brand new telecom=* key</div><div><br /></div><div>For now, only actual central offices, connection points and dslam in cabinet are covered to not clutter the discussion.</div><div>man_made=MDF doesn't necessarily have to be replaced by telecom=central_office but it would be great to do so.<br /></div><div>Further proposals will be needed to extend telecom=* key with cables, poles, man holes which are currently out of scope.<br /></div><div><br /></div><div>It's a collaborative work between 3 French contributors ZZ29,
atabaraud
and myself.<br /></div><div>Feel free to comment in the Talk page please</div><div><br /></div><div>All the best</div><div><br /></div><div>François</div></div></blockquote> </body>
</html>