<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
11. Jun 2018 13:09 by <a href="mailto:bhousel@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">bhousel@gmail.com</a>:<br /><p> <br /></p><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>But for right now, can we get that page taken down so people stop tagging it, and have a proper proposal put up and accepted?</div></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>I added <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features%2Ftransit&type=revision&diff=1617128&oldid=1617122" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features%2Ftransit&type=revision&diff=1617128&oldid=1617122</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Note that in case of horrible tag Wiki pages are not deleted but describing tag as a horrible - <br /></p><p>especially for horrible tags that are popular or used to be popular.</p><p><br /></p><p>And all proposal are kept, even really stupid ones. <br /></p><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div></div></blockquote><p> </p><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>OK, so we should probably have a conversation about how a tag like this can continue to exist for years</div></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>Part of the issue is that currently only JOSM considers encouraging users to not use completely</p><p>broken tags as something important.</p><p><br /></p><p>While iD design may exclude flooding user with warnings -</p><p> why its rendering suggests that for example [building=yes; demolished=yes] is a good idea?</p><p><br /></p><p>Current rendering suggests to editors that it is great idea to tag this way - see</p><p><a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/51/Special_rendering_for_demolished%3Dyes_in_iD_editor_of_OSM_data.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/51/Special_rendering_for_demolished%3Dyes_in_iD_editor_of_OSM_data.png</a></p><p><br /></p><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">Amazing, but I’m not surprised that the JOSM devs figured this out years ago :)</blockquote><p><br /></p>Note that JOSM issue was not closed as WONTFIX (yet?). </body>
</html>