<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br /><br /><br />13. Jun 2018 10:31 by <a href="mailto:marc.gemis@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">marc.gemis@gmail.com</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">I'm fine that all of those are called forest. But again that does not<br />help to exclude the one I have shown you in Waasmunster.</blockquote><p><br /></p><p>Exclude landuse=residential areas.</p><p><br /></p><p>So my current idea is to create</p><p><br /></p><p>(landuse=forest + natural=wood) - landuse=residential</p><p><br /></p><p>and calculate its area.<br /></p><p><br /></p><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">And again you have not answered my questions on how to map named<br />forests with lakes</blockquote><p><br /></p><p>I have no idea how to do that, lakes are just a start. There are forests split</p><p>because leaf_type or some other property changes but entire area has name.<br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Real fun starts where one</p><p>has forest (or park) where parts of named area has their own names.<br /></p><p><br /></p><p>It is on my (long) OSM TODO list to invent useful tagging for that.<br /></p><p> <br /></p><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"> and whether you think it's OK to have overlapping<br />landuse</blockquote><p><br /></p><p> It is certainly OK to have overlapping areas with landuse=residential (records landuse)<br /></p><p>and landuse=forest (records landcover).<br /></p> </body>
</html>