<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
19. Jun 2018 21:51 by <a href="mailto:osm@imagico.de" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">osm@imagico.de</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">If i read you correctly you are unwilling to<br /><br />* establish verifiable principles for decisions about tagging presets in <br />iD that limit use of presets to push subjectively preferred tagging <br />ideas against existing widely accepted practice.<br />* modify iD to allow for more diversity in tagging presets used by <br />mappers (for example by offering presets available in JOSM as an <br />alternative).<br />* refrain from connecting tagging discussions you start here to iD <br />preset decisions - including use of your decision power as leverage in <br />discourse, like with</blockquote><p><br /></p><p>I think that this concerns are valid, though I would not mix it with claim</p><p>that editor developers controlling presets is wrong.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is no real alternative, there is no an independent general preset,</p><p>and I would not expect to suddenly find people willing to maintain one in a <br /></p><p>long term.</p><p><br /></p><p>Especially after excluding developers of editors.<br /></p><p><br /></p><p>There is <a href="https://github.com/simonpoole/beautified-JOSM-preset" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://github.com/simonpoole/beautified-JOSM-preset</a> but it is</p><p><br /></p><p>- controlled by editor developer anyway</p><p>- has nearly no activity from people that are not developers of editors using it</p> </body>
</html>