<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/06/18 02:28, Bryan Housel wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:3BDB44F7-BA48-4825-836F-C357FB021BF0@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On Jun 23, 2018, at 10:58 AM, Martin
Koppenhoefer <<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com"
class="" moz-do-not-send="true">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:</div>
<div class="">
<div dir="auto" class="">
<div class="">+1, if you want to describe the position of
a first aid kit, a sensible tag seems
emergency=first_aid_kid</div>
<div class="">For a staffed location where you go for
first aid, emergency=first_aid seems ok (I’d rather use
something more verbose like first_aid_station or
facility to avoid confusing them with the kits).</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>Let’s just keep this scoped to first aid kits. If it was
staffed location, I’d probably use something under
`healthcare=*` (maybe `clinic`) </div>
<div><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare#Values"
class="" moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare#Values</a></div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">
<div dir="auto" class="">
<div class="">Generally, it is not OK to set up wiki pages
for rarely used tags out from nothing, they should be
added as proposals to make it easier for inexperienced
mappers to distinguish established tags from adhoc
drafts without consolidated content.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>Yes it is OK to</div>
<div>- invent a new tag value and </div>
<div>- setup a wiki page for it and </div>
<div>- notify the tagging list. </div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>People do this all the time (maybe without notifying the
tagging list, but let’s encourage more of that).</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>Proposals should only be for when we’re inventing a new
toplevel key or introducing a change that affects a lot of
things (like PTv2, healthcare, etc). I see a lot of proposal
misuse and proposals that shouldn’t be proposals in the first
place - let’s stop doing this.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Err .. proposals can be for anything, including sub tags. There
should be more of it.<br>
Things like the sub tag 'sales' under motorcycle shops could have
been avoided if that had come to the tagging group. <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:3BDB44F7-BA48-4825-836F-C357FB021BF0@gmail.com">
<div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>FWIW, someone else already made the wiki page. I’ve
cleaned it up and added the preset to iD.</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">
<div dir="auto" class="">
<div class=""><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=first_aid"
class="" moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=first_aid</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
</div>
<div>So that’s the tag. Be glad we accomplished something!</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Something? If that something is poor then is is not an
accomplishment. <br>
<br>
The value of 'first_aid' could be applied to a 'first aid room' ...
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_aid_room">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_aid_room</a>'<br>
<br>
Most kits are portable, many of them are designed to be portable.
are these included? No information on the OSMwiki page. <br>
<br>
73 is not a status of 'in use' !!!!<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>