<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jun 24, 2018, at 7:05 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com" class="">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Ok..<br class="">
I’ve decided after talking to a few more people about this that I’m going to just support things in iD the best I can, and pull back from tagging discussions. <br class="">
</blockquote></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra">"just support things" sounds fine, if this means adding support for established tags. I would not consider introducing new tags to be covered by "supporting things", or would you? What are your criteria to determine an "established tag"?</div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div>I’ll decide on a case-by-case basis. The main goals are to let people map what they want to map, and to make it easy for novice users to figure out.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Thanks, Bryan</div><div><br class=""></div></body></html>